
Instagram now allows public comments on Stories. Unlike direct message replies, these comments are visible to all viewers for as long as the Story is live. For teams managing Instagram accounts, this introduces a new, time-sensitive engagement surface that requires clear ownership and process.
For individual creators, this is a minor adjustment. For teams managing accounts across clients, brands, or departments, public Story comments introduce several new requirements.
Monitoring frequency increases: Story replies in DMs could be batched, whereas public comments cannot. A negative or off-topic comment sitting visibly on a Story for hours creates a different kind of risk than an unanswered DM. Teams need to check for comments more frequently while Stories are active.
Ownership must be defined: On most teams, Story creation and community management are handled by different people. The person who publishes a Story may not be the person responsible for moderating its comments. Without a clear assignment, comments fall through the cracks. Every Story that goes live needs to have an assigned monitor for its active period.
Response windows shrink: Stories last 24 hours. Comments on those Stories exist within the same window. If a team typically reviews engagement once per day, that cadence is no longer sufficient. The window for responding to or removing a comment is tied directly to the lifespan of the Story itself.
Triage becomes necessary: Not all comments require the same approach. Teams need a basic triage framework that covers these categories. Without one, every comment becomes a judgment call made by whoever happens to see it first.
Public Story comments affect several layers of team operations.
Scheduling and timing: If Stories are scheduled to publish outside of working hours, comments can accumulate while no one is monitoring. Teams should align Story publishing times with staff availability. Tools like Storrito that handle scheduled Story publishing make this alignment easier by giving teams control over exactly when content goes live.
Roles and permissions: The person moderating comments needs account access and clear guidelines. For agencies managing multiple client accounts, this means defining who has comment moderation access on each account. It also means ensuring handoffs between shifts are documented.
Escalation paths: Some public comments will require input from outside the social media team. A product complaint, a legal concern, or a PR-sensitive remark needs a defined escalation path. Teams should document who to contact and how, before the situation arises.
Comment controls: Instagram provides controls to filter or restrict who can comment on Stories. Teams should review these settings and decide on a default configuration per account. Disabling comments entirely is an option but removes a potential engagement channel. A better approach is to configure keyword filters and restrict comments to followers where appropriate.
The biggest risk with public Story comments is not the feature itself. It is the gap between content publishing and comment management.
In many organizations, these are separate functions. Content teams plan and publish and community teams respond and moderate. Public Story comments require these two functions to coordinate on timing.
A Story published at 8 AM needs comment coverage starting at 8 AM. If the community team starts at 9 AM, there is a one-hour gap where public comments go unmanaged.
Teams that use scheduling tools should map their publishing schedule against their moderation schedule to avoid gaps.
Adding public Story comment management to an existing workflow requires three things:
By focusing on these three operational aspects, teams can manage and leverage public Story comments effectively.

Be the first to know when we're adding new features and releasing new updates!